Associations between single-question Visual Analogue Scale pain score and weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain: data from 2 phase 3 clinical trials.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) are commonly used measuring tools of osteoarthritis (OA) pain.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to explore the associations between single-question VAS pain and the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing domains of WOMAC pain.
METHODS
Data from 2093 patients with OA participating in 2 phase 3 clinical trials were included for post hoc analyses. Univariate Pearson correlations and comparison of values were made using z statistics obtained using the Fisher to z test for all items of the VAS pain scale, the WOMAC pain subscale, the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing constructs of WOMAC pain subscale, and by subgroups of WOMAC pain quintiles and Kellgren-Lawrence grades
RESULTS
The correlations between VAS pain and WOMAC pain were significant ( = 0.67, < 0.001) with a slope of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.61). A similar correlation was found for weight-bearing pain ( = 0.68, < 0.001, slope: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.59-0.65) but significantly lower for non-weight-bearing pain ( = 0.55, < 0.001, slope: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.46-0.52). The degree of disagreement between the 2 instruments seemed to be lesser in the extreme ends of the scales, and the observed association between Kellgren-Lawrence grade and disagreement between VAS and WOMAC was driven by non-weight-bearing pain.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, VAS pain and WOMAC pain subscale correlation was found to be moderate and the VAS pain scale correlated more accurately with the WOMAC pain weight-bearing questions. This constitutes novel insight into patient with OA pain reporting.
